I hope this sheds some light on this topic.
This may have given us a keyhole to look through and see a tiny portion of what "domains" will be, but it doesn't really help us understand anything about it.
The ongoing discussion has raised some very interesting questions to which I do not have definitive answers.
And that's the reason any sort of development should start with discussion, not implementation.
I don't mean to be jumping you here; after all, I'm fairly new to this list. However, it doesn't make sense to me that you're working on implementing a very significant change here, and the first thing the -dev list hears about is (almost) PR-type hype. Ideally, we would have already talked about this new feature, discussed its ups and downs, talked about what we should watch out for during and after implementation, and so on.
Furthermore, I agree that if/when this is implemented, it should be the next major version, and in no way should that stop us from putting TRACE in the next minor version. The discussion of domains, IMHO, is completely irrelevant to the TRACE issue.
-- Toby Butzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ILC R&D Co-op / Georgia Tech CS / KKPsi Iota Sp03 678.904.2413 work / 678.362.6483 mobile Fifteen Piedmont Center, Suite 700 / Atlanta, GA 30305
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
