My only comment on this would be that maybe we should reserve the 2.0 version for major changes in the api, etc. I'm not proposing any changes right now, but if we wanted to take the time to clean up/change the api, I think doing it then would be better.
So, I guess I am voting to keep v1.3. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2.0 or 1.3? > > > > Hi, > It occurs to me that perhaps the next release of log4j should > be version > 2.0 instead of 1.3. It seems that: > - Log4j has been around long enough for a 2.0 release. > - The next version has significant new features, unseen > before, not just > improvements and enhancements of previous features. > > I wanted to ask, and hopefully settle, this matter with > enough time for > Ceki to revise his slides before ApacheCon ;) > > What do you think? > > Yoav Shapira > Millennium ChemInformatics > > > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential > business communication, and may contain information that is > confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is > intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, > and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by > anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, > please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
