Actually, I don't have anything fundamentally against the idea of commons-logging (encapsulating the logging implementation behind a generic interface), but the implementation has had and continues to have issues (someone jump in here). You can search the archive for this list and the log4j-user list for details. Ceki has a web page on the subject, the url of which I don't have handy.
-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Toby Butzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:19 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Logging services top level project > > > Mark Womack wrote: > > > 2) I personally see this as a great way to "take out" > commons-logging with... > > I know this is the wrong place to ask this (...putting on flame > retardant underwear...) -- but what's wrong with commons logging? > > -- > Toby Butzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ILC R&D Co-op / Georgia Tech CS / KKPsi Iota Sp03 > 678.904.2413 work / 678.362.6483 mobile > Fifteen Piedmont Center, Suite 700 / Atlanta, GA 30305 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
