> So I decided to create another port licensed under the APL, and that > would implement the DOMConfigurator, ODBCAppender, and SMTPAppender. >
My hat's off to you, that was a good move for the C++ community IMHO. > About the LS project, I propose that > - the configuration xml and property files should have the same syntax > in every subproject implementation. For example, if you have a big > project with a server-side implemented in C++, and a client-side > implemented in Java/JSP, you would like to use the same log > configuration file. > - Following the same idea, the appender and layout formats should be > compatible, in order, for example, to log from Java and C++, into the > same file, through the FileAppender, with the same XML format, through > the XMLAppender. > - All subprojects should be compatible with Chainsaw or LogFactor5 at > least through the XMLSocketAppender. > - All subprojects could have the same witness files and scripts for > functionality and performance tests. It could be an easy way to compare > each subproject. +1, and amen brother. Paul Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
