At 08:32 AM 5/10/2004 +1000, you wrote:
To: 'Log4J Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: socketappender stacktrace, is it necessary?

This has been bugging me for ages too.. Just committed a change.  I think
it's still an ERROR level, but doesn't log the full trace.  The message
though does contain the underlying exception message, so it's still pretty
useful.  Maybe a property on the appender if you DON'T want it to nag on
error?

This could be controversial, but I'm in agreement with Jacob on this one.

cheers,

Paul Smith

Thanks Paul!


Jake


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to