On Wednesday 20 October 2004 20:45, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Is there a valid reason for gump to track log4j 1.2? As I discussed with > you privately, Niclas, I do not wish to have the code on the CVS 1.2 branch > changed so that it differs from the released version (1.2.8.). We agreed > that you would use 1.3, the main trunk. Do you recall that?
Yes, I do, although that was for Avalon Merlin. > Anyway, I intend to ask the gumpmeisters to delete their support for the > 1.2 branch. Possibly a good idea, since after a closer check, it seems to be only Avalon and Eyebrowse that maintains the 1.2 dep. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
