DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16883>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 22:20 ------- Reasonable yes but not correct. The default constructor of an Appender is intended to be used with log4j Configrators (through config files). This is the well-known required for java beans pattern. For programmatic oconfigration, the general and recommendded usage pattern is: XAppender xa = new XAppender(); xa.setThisOption(...); xa.setThatOption(...); xa.activateOptions(); All constructors in Appenders which create a directly usable appender instances take parameters. None of them create a usable instance with the default (no parameter) constructor. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
