At 04:48 PM 12/14/2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 22:57, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
My sincerest apologies. Of course, Log4J are entitled to "fuck up" from time
to time. That is not something I want to undermine, and if it came across
like that, then I am truly sorry.
Niclas, there is no need to apologize. No offense was taken and my
remarks were not directed at you personally.
This is actually what the current implementation tries to do, but it has not
been solved properly. But Stefano is now on a mission to re-do a lot of
Gump's behaviour, and hopefully there will be improvements in both this area,
as well as the notification system.
Glad to hear it. You can view my previous post as a request for the
type of enhancement worked on by Stephano.
Looking back at my posts, I have a hard time seeing them as coming on hard.
The first post was a plain "FYI" in case you guys haven't noticed.
I know. Again, my remarks were not directed at you personally but at
the way in which a small mistake can be perceived by the community as
something as important as a nuclear meltdown.
I would like to know, if it is some old grudges you have against me, or how
humble does one have to be, not to offend you, Ceki... I am confused.
It's not a question of politeness or humility but of alarm. A typo in
a log4j class should be a non event, not a cause for 200 projects to
fail.
Old grudges? What old grudges? I don't know what you are talking
about. :-)
Cheers
Niclas
--
--
Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual:
https://www.qos.ch/shop/products/log4j/log4j-Manual.jsp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
