On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi, I don't think it's a bad idea, but could there be a more specific or domain-related name for it? Component(Base) is very generic, whereas Appender(Skeleton) is more logging-domain-specific.
Yoav
--- Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only method on o.a.l.spi.Component is setLoggerRepository. I assume the motivation is to inform "components" of which LoggerRepository they belong after their construction. I haven't looked at the problem. but my preference would be to modify the respective constructors to take either a LoggerRepository (assuming that it would be known at construction time) or something like a LoggerRepositoryLocator which could be used to locate the repository at a later time. Changing the constructors would force propagation of the LoggerRepository. The setLoggerRepository approach leaves the potential to forget to set the repository.
Could you describe the items that should be aware of the LoggerRepository?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
