Unfortunately, log4cxx's binary format is not platform independent.
There have been reports that 32-bit and 64-bit implementations don't
interoperate and I assume that 32-bit big-endian and 32-bit
little-endian wouldn't.
On Jan 13, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
- Log4j-dev accepts attachments while log4j-user does not.
- Performance wise, how well does the cxx method compare to java
serialization?
At 07:26 PM 1/13/2005, you wrote:
Ceki,
As the code currently stands it has two drawbacks:
1) It has my company's internal package names and structure. Worry
not, I have permission from the organisation to donate this code -
logging software is not exactly our core business. :-)
2) Having been written under the assumption that it would be an
internal tool, it has not been properly integrated into Log4J. The
correct way to do this would be to modify
org.apache.log4j.net.SocketServer to accomodate multiple methods of
parsing the incoming stream.
I'll gladly fix these items if you decide that this will be of
interest - I don't want to do the work if this has to stay an
internal tool! As the apache lists don't accept attachments, how do I
get the code to you?
Simon
-- Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
