On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 14:53, Curt Arnold wrote: > So I think that users > will just have to accept that messages in the log from a multithreaded > application may appear in a slightly different sequence than the > requests were made.
Which is sort of the reasoning behind having the appender generate the sequence number -- not the class itself. Then, you be sure that events appearing in a file would appear in the correct order. This would be part of the contract for Appender.doAppend. For appenders that don't have any reason to generate the sequence number (WriterAppender, et all.) you don't generate one. ChainsawAppender and SocketAppender would create one. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
