Curt, Curt Arnold <carnold <at> apache.org> writes:
> I agree with your analysis of the problem. If you need to restore Gump > immediately, backing up to log4j 1.2 would be the most expedient > approach. I don't think the recent changes got the amount of > discussion that was warranted for a breaking change and we might be > able to restore compatibility in short order. So if you are willing to > be broken for a few days, maybe we can eliminate the need for you to do > anything. > It is good to know that you are aware of the problem. We don't have any problem with the build being broken for a few days, so we will just wait for you to decide how you will proceed with this matter. I just wanted to check what the right course of action was to take. Thanks, --knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
