I agree, it makes sense to move Chainsaw to its own module. I'm not as enthusiastic about making Chainsaw a subproject - I'm not against the idea, but I think the developer community (hey, 2 or 3 is a community, right?) is too small to pass LS or Apache's expectations for a self-sustaining project.
Hopefully that will change.. I've been thinking about starting work on an Eclipse plugin version of Chainsaw. -----Original Message----- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 2/23/2005 8:11 AM To: Log4J Developers List; [email protected] Cc: Subject: Re: Chainsaw as seperate CVS module? At 03:44 AM 2/23/2005, Paul Smith wrote: >Hey All, > >Chainsaw is getting big. What does everyone think about moving Chainsaw >out into it's own CVS module and making it a 'client' of the log4j library? >In Eclipse one can make a Project have a dependency on another project, so >that makes it nice from a developer point of view, and from an Ant point >of view we can just have Chainsaw require to be built against specific >log4j jars. > >I have the following thoughts going through my mind at the moment that >would require add ingseveral jars to the dependencies of Chainsaw, and it >just might make everyones life easier if it were in a seperate >module. I'm not too fussed either way, but thought I would float the idea >in case people think it's a good idea. +1 I think its a very good idea to have chainsaw its own CVS module (and move to SVN later). Scott, what do you think? Spawning Chainsaw as a separate project is also a possibility. If Chainsaw is in its own module, a separate project could make sense. >Paul Smith -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<winmail.dat>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
