I used the option method because that's what was used for "javamail".
Perhaps we should make both javamail and jaf a true '<depends..' ?
Paul
Curt Arnold wrote:
On Feb 28, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
Hey all,
I've added the JAF (Java Activation Framework) to gump for this, by
adding:
<option project="jaf"/>
Using Curt's Cut'n'Paste philosophy - I looked at other projects and
they do it a slightly different way, but given that the above seemed
to get access to the Mail api, then it follows what doing the same
should give us access to the activation project. Hopefully someone
with gump-skillz can correct me if I'm wrong here.
Probably should have been a <depend> instead of an <option>. I
believe <depend> will skip running the test if "jaf" fails where
<option> indicates that running the tests should proceed even if "jaf"
failed. In this case, it appears that "jaf" is required for the tests
to run successfully. However that is a minor quibble.
There are several different flavors of Gump runs, if you browse
http://brutus.apache.org you can see the others. Only the 18:00
pacific time run sends out nag messages but the 6:00 or 12:00 pacific
time runs can be used as a preview. The Kaffe runs aren't very useful
since very few things build.
I'll review the 12:00 pacific time run when it completes and make any
touch up necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
