Mark, thanks for your initiative. Another item is SLF4J integration, which happens to be the next item on my plate.
At 01:43 4/27/2005, you wrote:
Hey Curt,
We can put the issues into Bugzilla after we have hashed through it some here on the list. That being said, another item to add:
- Other: - Review and resolve open bugs
-Mark
> -----Original Message----- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 4:19 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: next log4j release? > > I'd put (Ceki, Curt) or (Curt, Ceki) next to LoggingEvent and > LoggingEvent serialization > > I have unverified fears that the XMLLayout may not handle edge-cases > well, but haven't researched that. > > Have previously discussed either on the list or with Ceki, the > desirability for having target in the tests/build.xml for low level > tests. Right now all the ant test targets are fairly high-level and I > don't think it is desirable to add an Ant target for each class that > you want to test. Maybe a grab bag "internals" or other reorganization > of tests/build.xml. > > Are you intending to use Bugzilla to track the progress for the > releases (that is, add a bug report for the each release and issue and > make the release dependent on the issue) or do you have another way > that you want to manage the issues.? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
