Hi, Obviously there are already enough -1's ;) Let's pull the release off the server, as I don't think the current disclaimer is sufficient.
And let's start a separate thread to discuss dependence on slf4j. I wonder if it can be done dynamically, with runtime discovery or a similar mechanism, rather than as a hard compile-time dependency. Yoav Quoting Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As a formality, I'm proposing a vote on releasing log4j 1.2.10. > > As previously mentioned, I am -1 on the release at this point pending further > discussion. > > Scott > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
