At 06:49 5/1/2005, you wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:09 -0500, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> >I am not a member of the slf4j team, so I cannot speak to it's goals,
etc.
>
> I think just about any Log4j committer is part of the slf4j team, unless I
> am mistaken. I'm guessing that this probably also extends to
> commons-logging developers. In any case, I wouldn't characterize you as
> not being part of the slf4j team. I think if you show a development or
> steering interest, you are probably part of the team. Ceki, can you
> clarify this? I think there is some ambiguity here. How does one
become a
> committer on the slf4j project? Does one need to have commit access to be
> considered part of the slf4j project team?
Actually, as SLF4J is just 4 simple core classes + 2 classes per
concrete logging library, there isn't much need for a large pool of
committers. I would say 3 people (to ensure project continuity) is as
many as SLF4J would ever need.
The number of people who can *vote* on SLF4J design-related matters is a
different issue. I guess the committers for SLF4J are the ones that
decide the policy on that, but I would recommend that the policy be that
* the committers on SLF4J
* plus any committer on log4j
* plus any committer on JCL
all be entitled to vote, and that voting follow standard ASF procedures.
Do you mind if we continue this discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Regards,
Simon
--
Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
