I wouldn't discourage your from filing bugs with the use-cases that you were trying to support. At least that would allow us to know what concerns prompted the development. If there are code fragments that you think would fit within a RollingPolicy or TriggeringEventEvaluator, you could copy them into the body of the message. I think it is unlikely that we'd take the whole appender (at least not into the main stream development), but you could either attach it now or we could come back to you if it looked like it would be helpful. Attaching the file to the bug would allow others to retrieve the code even if it doesn't make it into a release.
If you are considering contributing code, you should read http://www.apache.org/licenses/, particularly the section on Contributor License Agreements. CLA's are required for substantial code contributions to be accepted.
On May 5, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I'd suggest not contributing a new SMTPAppender, but contributing an implementation of TriggeringEventEvaluator that meets your 'don't send for 5 minutes' policy.
Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
