DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34850>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34850 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-10 21:34 ------- I was just thinking about this class. In the log4j 1.3 development, the previous rolling file appenders had been removed in favor of a new generic RFA framework (in org.apache.log4j.rolling). Unfortunately this left users of the former RollingFileAppender and DailyRollingFileAppender without a migration path. To address that I added emulations of RFA and DRFA that wrap the new framework. I was unaware of ExternallyRolledFileAppender at that time. The CVS log for the removal of ERFA says it was an "unused" class but since there are several bug reports on ERFA, I can't see how it can be claimed as unused. I hope to add an emulation similar to those added for the other log4j 1.2 xRFA's and make a stab at addressing the bugs. If you are able to provide feedback on that work, that would be appreciated. I've also just posted a thread suggesting a new minor release branch, that may be able to incorporate any fixes from the 1.3 line, however the 1.2 line has been closed to anything less than a critical bug. May be same bug as 30407 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
