On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:52:19 +0200, Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi guys,
I like the UGLI approach - simple and efficient.
You do realize that UGLI has been dropped in favor or SLF4J, right?
http://slf4j.org/
Did not know that since the log4j homepage does not state that fact ,)
And besides slf4j has the exact same "issue"...but i'll go there instead.
thank you,
Max
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
