+1. I don't want to hold off on patches that are simple and non-controversial. If anyone has a concern or question about a given patch, then please speak up after reviewing.
-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 11:41 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Starting 1.2.12 release effort > > > On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > I think we should target 7/13 as the date to finalize the set of > > bugs to > > include in the 1.2.12 release. Fixes/patches would be applied soon > > after > > that (they can be applied sooner if no objections) with a release > > by the end > > of July. > > > I see no reason to hold off on any non-disruptive patches. If we > hold off committing, we are either likely to hold off doing work > until the list is finalized or end up with the potential for > conflicting patches. Anything huge or with significant potential > consequences should be discussed, but hopefully nothing like that is > being considered for 1.2.12. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
