If we are going to restore classes that have been previously removed, then we should mark them as deprecated in favor of the classes/features that are replacing them in v1.3. In this case I believe it is the new filtering expression language(s)?
-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 1:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia > DenyAllFilter.java LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java > StringMatchFilter.java > > carnold 2005/07/01 13:56:00 > > Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia DenyAllFilter.java > LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java > StringMatchFilter.java > Log: > Bug 35452: Restore o.a.l.varia filter classes > > Revision Changes Path > 1.9 +17 -45 logging- > log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia/DenyAllFilter.java > > > > > 1.11 +4 -65 logging- > log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia/LevelMatchFilter.java > > > > > 1.6 +19 -103 logging- > log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia/LevelRangeFilter.java > > > > > 1.11 +26 -53 logging- > log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia/StringMatchFilter.java > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
