DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35052>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35052 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-07 23:52 ------- I tried this on my Windows machine using jdk 1.4.2_07. I modified the performance.xml to reference the 1.2.11 and 1.2.12rc2 jars instead of the classes build in the cvs head. I see an improvement in the 1.2.12 version: getLogger: (using jdk 1.4.2_07, log4j 1.2.11) [java] Usage: java org.apache.log4j.GetLoggerTest passes [nameCount nameLength] [java] Pass 0: 1232 ms. [java] Average non-initial pass: 34 ms. getLogger: (using jdk 1.4.2_07, log4j 1.2.12rc2) [java] Usage: java org.apache.log4j.GetLoggerTest passes [nameCount nameLength] [java] Pass 0: 832 ms. [java] Average non-initial pass: 21 ms. Not an incredible improvement in my environment (WinXP HE, Pentium III, 652 MHz, 256 MB RAM), but an improvement. More interestingly to me is that with the 1.2.12 code, the times for the non-initial passes is highly variable (in my tests from 0 - 70ms). The avg is less though. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
