> As a potential consumer of the "official" build, there are a lot of > things of the build "machine" that are invisible: the platform, the > compiler, the version of Ant , the JDK, the specific versions of JAF, > JMS, JAXP, JNDI, Javamail, Javadoc, etc. Whether the compiler was > selected by the release manager specifying it on a command line or by > the release manager editing a build.properties that I never get to > see is just one of them.
Yep. I think we should consider putting more of that info into the manifest in some form. Just for reference, the manifest from log4j 1.2.9 has: Manifest-Version: 1.0 Created-By: Apache Ant 1.5.1 Name: org/apache/log4j/ Implementation-Title: log4j Implementation-Version: 1.2.9 Implementation-Vendor: "Apache Software Foundation" Doesn't say what version of the jdk was used for compiling. Ceki, what version of the jdk did you use to build v1.2.9? -Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
