On Aug 30, 2005, at 12:45 AM, Mark Womack wrote:
I hope.
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/logging/log4j/log4j-1.2.12
For some reason all of the .class files are different than the
1.2.12rc6 build. I don't know why. I verified that jdk 1.3.1_16
was used to do the build.
This build and rc6 appeared consistent with each other to me.
Neither build was not consistent with my local builds and I do not
know why. I thought I had checked that previously, but either
something changed or I've at least one of the comparisons incorrectly.
I was surprised that Ant 1.6.4 was being used for your builds, but
downgrading from Ant 1.6.5 did not seem to affect the produced build
other than the manifest.
For analysis, it would be interesting to see the log file created by
doing:
ant clean
ant release -v -l build.log
Curt, can you run this version through the battery of tests in your
environment setup?
Reran tests on Windows 2000 + JDK 1.1.8, 1.2.2, 1.3.1_16, 1.4.2, and
1.5.0 with no problems.
And getting something like vmware setup on machine is the next
order of business for me. We need something like that to maintain/
control the build environment better.
I think a LiveCD approach like Knoppix would be a better solution for
the release build environment for log4j 1.3 and later.
However VM's are great for testing releases on various OS+JDK
combinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
