-Mark
On 10/12/05, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
-0.5 on using Maven. My experience with it has been that it's kind of nice for
generating project documentation, but for most real-life (i.e. complex
dependencies, multiple builders on different environments) projects, the setup
overhead is not worth the benefits.
It is also not as widely used as Ant, and I don't want to raise the bar for our
users who build log4j themselves without a significant benefit.
We should instead keep build.properties.default more suitable for you so you
have very little (if any) manual build.properties updating to do each time. If
we have managed to do it for Tomcat and other more complicated products (as we
have), we can do it for log4j.
Yoav
--- Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with using Maven for the build environment
> with/instead of Ant? I am really tired of having to keep the
> build.properties up to date on my machine and update everytime I do a new
> checkout. I saw where Maven can be used to grab the desired version from
> ibiblio, etc, but I don't know how the rest of our build would translate. I
> need to do more homework.
>
> If anyone has experience or opinions, I would like to hear back.
>
> thanks,
> -Mark
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
