thanks,
-Mark
On 10/24/05, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
I don't mind putting it up for a vote, but we could make it a lazy
approval vote.
Let's agree on something and get it in the 'Actions' section of the
bylaws.
-----Original Message-----
From: Yoav Shapira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:36 AM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] log4j 1.3 alpha 7 release
Hi,
+1, and I also don't think we need a vote to release an alpha (or beta,
+or RC)
build, only a vote on declaring something stable.
Yoav
--- Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Mark Womack < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > This is vote to decide if the current build of log4j 1.3 alpha 7
> > should be released. If accepted, the build located at:
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/builds/logging/log4j/log4j-1.3a7/
> >
> > would be moved to the release area, with the related signed
> > versions, and the related download pages would be updated
> > accordingly (PMC approval, of course).
> >
> > I am +1.
> >
>
> +1, although does an alpha really need a vote?
>
> Jake
>
> > -Mark
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
