Hola, > biased view. But I don't agree with the documentation. We REALLY need to > do something. I think our current state is pretty shameful.
I only bundled them together because one of the reasons for moving to Maven is improved documentation. > I'd like to > get more community involvement, but there hasn't been much reaction. I'd > like to set it up and then have it evolve on its own track. I don't > consider it a "pure enhancement". I actually don't think the docs are shameful, or you'd be seeing more involvement from the community and more doc RFEs in Bugzilla. No documentation is ever perfect, and there is plenty of room for improvement of course, but I think log4j's documentation is not bad considering its audience of developers/engineers concerned about low-level details like logging. > But the code cleanup and review should come first. Yeah, for sure. -- Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
