Yeah, the configureAndWatch methods would be added back for
PropertyConfigurator too.
OK, I'll add those back in tomorrow. Coming up with the test cases will
take the time.
And we should start a document of the "expected differences" and pass that
on the user list with each release.
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [COMPATIBILITY] DOMConfigurator
On Jan 2, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
I'd be ok with this being one of the binary compatibility breakages. I
don't believe there would be too many people that had extended from
DOMConfigurator.
I'm okay with it too, at least for this iteration. I assume that we'd
both like the configureAndWatch methods added back to DOMConfigurator and
PropertyConfigurator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]