DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38617>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-11 21:53 ------- I don't see any mechanism that assigns a numerical level value an unrecognized level. How would log4j know whether NOTICE where more or less significant than "ERROR", for example. In the current (less than optimal) mechanism, that infomation is coded into the class. The patch seems to predate the restoration of Level extending Priority that occurred to bring log4j 1.3 back into line with log4j 1.2. I definitely agree the current level extension mechanism is not ideal. I've thought about extending log4j to recognize arbitary integer values for levels, so if you wanted 9999 levels between DEBUG and INFO you could have them without any custom code, though the level names might be DEBUG+5000. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
