DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39135>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39135 Summary: Bad patterns in ISO8601DateFormat and DateTimeDateFormat Product: Log4j Version: 1.3alpha Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Layout AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] o.a.l.helpers.ISO8601DateFormat and o.a.l.helpers.DateTimeDateFormat were restored to the trunk in rev 371710 on 2006-01-23 logged against bug 35452 (the catch all log4j 1.3 incompatibility bug). These implementations were provided strictly for existing applications and are not used with log4j. The new implementations simply delegate to java.util.SimpleDateFormat unlike the log4j 1.2 implementations which attempted an independent implementation. Unfortunately, the patterns used were lifted directly from the log4j 1.2 javadoc comments which were wrong. The use of YYYY instead of yyyy would result in an exception on construction and the use of yyyy- mm-dd instead of yyyy-MM-dd would result in the value of the hour being used as the date. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
