Re: [VOTE] was Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate log4j-concurrent from sandbox to trunk

[Paul Smith]

+1 (have actually suffered deadlock problems with log4j in production)

On 22/07/2006, at 7:31 AM, Elias Ross wrote:

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:09 -0700, Elias Ross wrote:

This should get you the source.

svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox/log4j/ concurrent log4j-concurrent

I'd like to put out a vote in the next week.  I would appreciate your
help.

of the concurrent library to trunk. :-)

Please answer with 1 or 0 and your choice of + and - symbols.

[Why?  1. Provides deadlock-free appenders.  2. Provides a base for
appenders that could benefit from concurrency, e.g. those that do I/O.
3. Could serve as a basis for the Log4j 2.0 redesign.  4. Does not
impact the Log4j 1.3 release or compatibility and is very small. ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Okay, now that it's "next week" I'm calling for a vote for the migration

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature