Discussion started on log4j-dev on 2006-06-30 (http://
marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=115170188015523&w=2).
Vote called by Elias Ross on 2006-07-21 21:31:30 GMT (http://
marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=115351752127475&w=2).
Okay, now that it's "next week" I'm calling for a vote for the
migration
of the concurrent library to trunk. :-)
Please answer with 1 or 0 and your choice of + and - symbols.
[Why? 1. Provides deadlock-free appenders. 2. Provides a base for
appenders that could benefit from concurrency, e.g. those that do I/O.
3. Could serve as a basis for the Log4j 2.0 redesign. 4. Does not
impact the Log4j 1.3 release or compatibility and is very small. ]
Votes:
+1: Elias Ross (non-binding, implied)
+1: Yoav Shapira (binding)
+1: Scott Deboy (binding)
+1: Jacob Kjome (binding)
+1: Paul Smith (binding)
+1: Curt Arnold (binding)
72 hours have elapsed since vote was called with no vetos and
sufficient +1s to carry the proposed change by Lazy Consensus.
I'll start on the changes shortly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
