DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41214>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41214 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 09:34 ------- The file size is the same as log4j-1.2.8.jar, however the line number from RollingFileAppender does not correspond to any synchronization block in that version (the link number from Category does). If you could do a "unzip -l log4j.jar", you should see the timestamps within the jar file. log4j-1.2.8.jar would have timestamps of 2003-02-20. If you extract the members of log4j-1.2.8.jar ("jar xf log4j-1.2.8.jar"), the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file would have an Implementation-Version of 1.2.8. I've reviewed the subversion history for RollingFileAppender in the v1_2-branch. Line 126 falls within RFA.rollOver in revisions 309239 (2001-07-20) and later. The implementation of RFA has not been substantially changed in that period and that line number corresponds to either a blank line, a File constructor or a File.exists call, none of which should acquire a lock on a category. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
