DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41735>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41735 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-28 16:50 ------- I don't have time to research this at the moment, but need make sure that the patch does not cause a rollover to be attempted on every subsequent log request after a rename fails. My recollection is that RFA would be suseptible to that and locking the .1 file would in very quick order bring performance to its knees and delete all the older files. If the existing log file can't be renamed, then the next rollover should be attempted at about the time the next rollover attempt would happen. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
