I got stuck, and all I can think of are these. Other people may want to look at this and think about what might compel them to switch to log4j2 (when we get there.. :) )

Compelling Reasons for a log4j2 adoption

* Ease of migration/Drop in replacement for log4j 1.2 - If we do not meet this fundamental goal, I seriously doubt we'll ever gain traction. We should be free from the log4j1.2 design, but we should begin early to ensure that the core design can be easily shimmed with a log4j2-1.2compatibility.jar or equivalent.

* Finer grained synchronization - log4j1.2 has a weakness in it's synchronization mechanism that can cause problems in high load situations. In it's earlier years this was never a problem, but more and more people hit these bottlenecks.

* Simplicity of management - 1.2 has a nice and easy .properties and .xml configuration mechanism but lacks finer grained runtime management controls. The jmx support in 1.2 is rather weak.

* Advanced Context logging - go beyond MDC and NDC to domains/markers and other concepts. Provide advanced tools to easily correlate logging events together for analysis.

* Locale-based logging - not everyone speaks English, or a single language. Applications written for other countries may wish to deploy with bundles for logging messages. The var-args support in Java 5 makes this one easy-peasy. It also can limit the cost of logging String concatenation and remove the ugly code "if (LOG.isDebugEnabled())". If the LOG.debug(...) statement can take var-args, then there is no overhead of string construction until the actual point you know you have to append something.

* Small core module size - not one big uber jar (people are funny about large jars) - a somewhat weak argument, but you'd be surprised...

Paul Smith
Core Engineering Manager

Aconex
The easy way to save time and money on your project

696 Bourke Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3000, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9240 0200  Fax: +61 3 9240 0299
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.aconex.com

This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. The contents may be privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright or other applicable law. No confidentiality or privilege is lost by an erroneous transmission. If you have received this e-mail in error, please let us know by reply e-mail and delete or destroy this mail and all copies. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. The sender takes no responsibility for the effect of this message upon the recipient's computer system.



Reply via email to