Log4j/trunk is no longer the main development branch. Renaming it
log4j/branches/v1_3-branch would eliminate mistaking it for the latest
and greatest. It may disrupt someone (we'd address gump as part of
the change), but I think they'd eventually have to deal with it.
I'm not sure if we should have trunk be a link to 1.2 or abandon it
until 2.0 is viable.
Thought?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
