DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43101>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43101 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-12 21:04 ------- The only @since 1.3, I saw on the v1_2-branch was in LoggingEventTest and I don't think that any @since tags are needed on the tests. For component, extras and receivers, I think you could pull all @since tags since the items will have existing from initial release of the companion. Putting @since 1.2.15 in extras would be potentially confusing since extras could be used with many of the earlier log4j 1.2.x's. If there are @since 1.3 in Chainsaw, then the could be changed to reflect the anticipate version number for Chainsaw. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
