I thought it would be a good idea to put it in the same location as log4j.dtd.
Scott -----Original Message----- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 4:56 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Why place logger.dtd in log4j.jar (was Re: svn commit: r563405 - /logging/log4j/branches/v1_2-branch/src/main/resources/org/apache/log4j/ xml/logger.dtd) On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2007, at 1:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Author: sdeboy >> Date: Mon Aug 6 23:49:24 2007 >> New Revision: 563405 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=563405 >> Log: >> - added logger.dtd to support processing of java.util.logging dtd- >> formatted events >> - added locationInfo support to multicastappender >> (note: no support for MDC or event properties in XMLLayout/1.2 >> log4j.dtd, so application/hostname properties won't be sent for >> udp/multicastappender) >> >> - updated logfilepatternreceiver to support tailing over VFS >> (VFSlogfilepatternreceiver commit will follow shortly) >> >> tested udpappender/receiver, socketappender/receiver, >> logfilepatternreceiver, xmlsocketreceiver receiving events from >> java.util.logging sockethandler >> >> Added: >> logging/log4j/branches/v1_2-branch/src/main/resources/org/ >> apache/log4j/xml/logger.dtd > > I don't see why logger.dtd needs to be added the log4j itself. I > could find no references to it within log4j, though it is > referenced in receivers. It would seem like placing the DTD within > the receivers jar would be preferable. > Still waiting for a response. Placing it in log4j.jar seems to be the wrong place. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
