DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43295>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43295 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-16 14:55 ------- The more I think about it, the more I too think this is a good idea, but only in the ZeroConfSocketHubAppender case. That is, I don't think we should modify the parent class to add that behavior, but allow the ZeroConf child appender class to choose a random port. I believe passing a port value of 0 to the internal Java Socket classes ends up choosing a random port IIRC. I was planning on having a crack at this but I may not get to it, so if anyone beats me to the punch feel free to attach a patch for consideration. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
