DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-23 13:30 ------- Are you 100% positive? I'm using the same patch right now with DOMConfigurator. In production environment, no less. The idea was that DOMConfigurator.subst(String) calls DOMConfigurator.subst(String,Props), which calls OptionConverter.substVars(String,Props), which in turn calls my PropertyResolver.getInstance().resolveProperty(String,Props). As long as a specific implementation of Configurator eventually calls OptionConverter.substsVars, my PropertyResolver.getInstance().resolveProperty(...) is called. Yes, I know it can be accomplished easier by subclassing a XxxConfigurator, but this way we can have any combination of XxxConfigurator and YyyPropertyResolver. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
