[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12607124#action_12607124
]
Paul Smith commented on LOG4J2-9:
---------------------------------
We should consider Spring as part of this configuration too. I don't have
anything off the top of my head in mind here,but since Spring is such a rich
configuration environment we should probably not ignore how log4j may fit into
a Spring environment.
> log4j 2.0 should leverage existing (preferably ASF) configuration frameworks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-9
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-9
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Configurators
> Reporter: Curt Arnold
>
> log4j 2.0 should avoid implementing its own configuration framework in
> preference to being compatible with commonly used configuration frameworks
> and services. Compatibility with existing log4j 1.2 configuration files
> might be accomplished by XSLT transforms that convert the legacy format into
> the equivalent with the selected configuration framework. log4j 2.0 should
> be readily configurable with JMX and a JMX centric design for configuration
> may be desirable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
