https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42189
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #16 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-02
13:08:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> As you want, that's a small and useful feature though, but as long as an
> alternative exists that's fine.
>
> Paul's implementation has an interesting advantage, the redirection can be
> simply declared in an external configuration file. the SL4J bridge requires to
> change the code to call SLF4JHandler.install(). The declarative approach is
> better IMHO, it's less intrusive and doesn't require to recompile its code to
> enable the redirection. (btw I'm not a SL4J expert, I may have missed a
> similar
> feature).
There can never be enough free software :)
As other code in log4j-core needs Java 1.4+ to compile I see no reason why this
could not go in the core distribution. Can we still support Java 1.1 even when
compiling with a Java 1.5 compiler?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
