Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Ralph Goers skrev den 03-08-2008 17:23:
I don't think you got the point I was trying to make. I fully agree
that some bugs can't be fixed in 1.2.x. I fully agree that they
should be resolved in bugzilla. But as they are moved to WONTFIX here
a corresponding issue should be opened in Jira for log4j2 so that it
can be determined if it is appropriate to be fixed in that version. I
really don't want to have to scour bugzilla to find all these cases
if I don't have to.
Can we agree that WONTFIX'es are not bugs but possibly enhancement
requests?
Your suggestion is sound, but I think that the work will be somewhat
redundant. Allow me to explain.
I have understood that at the moment log4j is version 1.2 only as the
1.3 has been discontinued (and apparently is now logback), so there is
no version 2 in the horizont and - more importantly - no particular
reason for a version 2. Hence I think that the best approach is to
postpone any work with log4j version 2 including issue migration until
a version 2 road map is being worked out. At that time it makes sense
to look at ALL the bugzilla issues to see what would be reasonable to
put in the road map.
1.2 is the only current version. 1.3 has been discontinued. The basic
work to start 2.0 has been done. A branch has been created for the
initial 2.0 work at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/.
Jira has been setup to capture all the work for 2.0 at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2.
I expect to start doing stuff in the branch within the next few weeks.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
