https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47595
Curt Arnold <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #5 from Curt Arnold <[email protected]> 2009-10-03 21:13:11 PDT --- Sorry, I thought I had commented on this on the mailing list. javax.xml.parsers was available for earlier JDK's as an additional component. The source and target parameters on a Java compiler do not indicate the version of JDK necessary to build the component, they specify the version of the Java language specification accepted and the version of the Java byte-code emitted. There are specific reasons why 1.1 was chose for byte-code and 1.2 was selected for source. Those choices were made a long time ago and maybe the should be review but the post did indicate any specific problem that occurred due to that choice or advantage that would be gained by changing the versions. As deep in the maintenance cycle as log4j 1.2 is, it seems unwise to make changes for no defined benefit. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
