Hi guys, following on from my comment, I've uploaded a proposed modularisation here: http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/7c5b4689d5cc509d207e3270fc6f012ea8064c6d http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/ce3ce992d509e8c341914437bbc11442711fc5bf
As well as the module split, I would also do a more complete maven migration (except for possibly the NT build stuff). My immediate drive for this (apart from the other obvious benefits) is the file size of the log4j jar (~800k). Removing LF5 alone removes 490k (uncompressed). I know this drives up the complexity, but I think it is worth if to get the at least the GUI stuff out. Cheers. Antony Stubbs wrote: > > Hi guys, what's the established opinion from log4j about breaking > log4j up into modules ie net, nt appender, chainsaw etc? > > Regards, > Antony Stubbs > Technical Architect - Prototyping > Telecom Retail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > ----- > ___________________________ > http://stubbisms.wordpress.com > ----- ___________________________ http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172026.html Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
