On May 24, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: > Den 24/05/10 08.54, Ralph Goers skrev: >> BTW - If I didn't say it before, this is the one place that git would be >> helpful. You could fork the code and do what you like and I could merge >> back what I like, etc. I don't really find git all that much more >> compelling for development once you have a trunk being co-developed, unless >> you change the development model to one where everyone works on their own >> fork and then merges back. While you can do this with SVN, git makes this >> really easy. >> > This would perhaps be a good time to switch to a distributed SCM to avoid the > reliance on a central server? This I would personally think is a good idea. > > There is no clear consensus on Stack Overflow on which one of bzr, git and hg > to use, and I have no personal preference, except that good IDE support would > be nice. >
There is some support for git at http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html, http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache and http://git.apache.org. Unless someone wants to beat me to it, I'll request git mirroring for log4j tomorrow. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
