So what are the remaining outstanding tasks? Remove ZeroConf companion?
I haven't done anything to support OSGi for the companions.. I'd really like to get these out the door so I can start a vote on a Chainsaw release soon.. There are some redundant files (Compare, VectorAppender if I recall), although Compare isn't identical everywhere, it does make it annoying to have everything set up in as source in Idea.. Also, maybe it's time to move VFSLogFilePatternReceiver out of Chainsaw and into the receivers companion.. Its tailing support is much better than the basic LogFilePatternReceiver..would require adding a dependency on VFS from receivers, but I don't think that's a big deal.. Thoughts? Scott On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]> wrote: > ZeroConf is now redundant after my changes to add multicast dns support to > all of the network-based appenders. The use of the jmDNS library is only > through reflection, so there are no compile-time dependencies and it's not > declared in the pom. > > Scott > > > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Curt Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just backported 1.2.16 changes to the extras companion. I haven't had any >> chances to extras on gcj or harmony, so might have some minor changes come >> from that. Will have to pick it up tomorrow. >> >> Have we done OSGi metadata for any of the companions? >> >> mvn rat:check on extras will flag a lot of the comparison files. Should >> be excluded from the check, but I think the Apache RAT plugin doesn't honor >> exclusions, so may have to revert to the earlier codehaus. >> >> Maybe it is time to file bug reports for the releases that we want to >> make. If there are release blocking bugs, they should be listed as blockers >> for the release bug. I haven't checked the bug list, but I don't know of >> any. >> >> Was there a companion that we wanted to abandon? >> >> >> On May 14, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: >> >> > I think I'm in the home stretch of the features I'd like to get in to >> this Chainsaw release, so I have cycles to help get companions out the door >> if needed. >> > >> > Anything I can help with? >> > >> > Scott >> > >> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Curt Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Need to back port some of the later fixes in the log4j 1.2.16 release >> back into the extras companion. Other than that I don't know of anything. >> > >> > I've got some evenings free later this week and was going to try to >> clean up some post 1.2.16 issues. >> > >> > >> > On May 4, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: >> > >> > > Are there any outstanding issues preventing us from moving forward >> with a release of the companions? >> > > >> > > Scott >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
