Oki, I understand.
txs 4 the explanation!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 6/21/11, Joern Huxhorn <jhuxh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> From: Joern Huxhorn <jhuxh...@googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: log4j-2.0 questions
> To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 9:39 AM
>
> On 20.06.2011, at 23:33, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Mark, thanks for parThere are two cases here. In
> the first the method signature includes a Throwable. In that
> case it is unambiguous and is handled properly. In the
> second case, Joern Huxhorn provided the ParameterizedMessage
> class that detects that the last Object in the array is a
> Throwable and handles it. However, there is an oddity
> that in some cases the Throwable appears in the
> ParameterizedMessage isn't propagated to the LogEvent
> correctly. I'll create a test for that and fix it.
>
> Theres an issue in ParameterizedMessage? Please let me know
> of anything you find out!
> I tested that class quite thoroughly...
>
> The fact, that ("{}", someThrowable) does not propagate the
> Throwable to the event, is by design. It is only used as the
> Throwable of the message if it is not "used up" by a
> placeholder.
> Otherwise, it wouldn't be possible to simply use
> throwable.toString() as a parameter to the message without
> also creating a pretty big Throwable including stacktrace,
> cause, etc.
>
> Cheers,
> Joern.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
