On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Keep up the good work, Christian. I'm hoping interest will pick up once 2.0 
> becomes more public. If you have an interest in helping with that you are 
> more than welcome!
>

Thanks Ralph :-)
I have a local checkout for a good while already, just need to find
some time to get into :-)

Cheers


> Ralph
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> OK. So it seems you are fine we move on with the release.
>> Will prepare it for the weekend.
>>
>> Thanks for your support!
>> A pity, nobody else did comment here.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I see no harm in it as the next put will just create a new Hashtable, which 
>>> shouldn't be all that expensive in new JVMs.  I really am not crazy about 
>>> it using Hashtable as I really don't see why a Map with synchronized 
>>> methods is required. But it is probably best to just leave well enough 
>>> alone on that issue and it isn't necessary to fix this problem.  FWIW, 
>>> Logback doesn't call remove() when the map is empty and at the moment 
>>> neither does Log4j 2, but I think I'm going to change it to do it.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello fellow devs,
>>>>
>>>> can one of you give me a hint on this? As you know i am just helping
>>>> out with log4j and so I am glad about comments from more experienced
>>>> people, esp, in this case. I really would like to close this issue
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to let remove() call clear()?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:10 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Comment #12 from [email protected] 2012-01-25 22:10:41 UTC ---
>>>>> Ok, the patch was accepted, modified and applied I get that.
>>>>> a) Shouldn't this ticket be marked as 'resolved'?
>>>>> b) What's the ETA for 1.2.17?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I believe there's a second issue. The way it's implemented right 
>>>>> know
>>>>> clients must explicitly call MDC.clear(). Couldn't/shouldn't remove() call
>>>>> clear() internally once the last item was removed()?
>>>>> How do clients know when to call clear()? In a request processing chain 
>>>>> (e.g.
>>>>> Servlet filter) several parties may write items and each one of them is
>>>>> responsible to call remove() for the items it added. On the way it items 
>>>>> are
>>>>> added, on the way out they're removed in reverse order. And the last guy 
>>>>> closes
>>>>> the door i.e. calls clear(). However, how does a client know that he's the
>>>>> last?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Configure bugmail: 
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>>>>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>>>>> You are the assignee for the bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to